Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2026

Where Is BC Going With The Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA)?

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The BC Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (“DRIPA”), and the related United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (“UNDRIP”)...

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

The BC Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (“DRIPA”), and the related United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (“UNDRIP”), has attracted considerable public attention recently, especially following the BC Supreme Court rulings in Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (“Cowichan Tribes“)1 and Gitxaala v British Columbia (“Gitxaala“).2

In Cowichan Tribes, Justice Young relied on DRIPA in supporting her conclusion that the provisions of the Land Title Act that provide “indefeasible” title to private landowners do not apply to protect against Aboriginal title claims over private land.3

In Gitxaala, the court relied on DRIPA as an “interpretive aid” in addressing the “proper reading” of the BC Mineral Tenure Act and declared that the Province’s online mineral claim system used to grant mineral claims under that Act is inconsistent with UNDRIP.4

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from