Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2017

The MIG Is Unconstitutional? A Surprising FSCO Decision

In Abyan v. Sovereign General Insurance Company (FSCO A16-003657, September 14, 2017) Arbitrator Benjamin Drory has released a surprising and unexpected decision finding that section 3...

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

In Abyan v. Sovereign General Insurance Company (FSCO A16-003657, September 14, 2017) Arbitrator Benjamin Drory has released a surprising and unexpected decision finding that section 3 (the definition of "minor injury") and section 18(2) of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule are unconstitutional, as the sections infringe upon section 15(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the basis of physical disability. Furthermore, he finds that the infringements are not justifiable under section 1 of the Charter.

The substantive issues in this case are minimal and include $1,995.32 for psychological treatment and the applicability of the Minor Injury Guideline. The Applicant served notice of the intention to raise a constitutional argument as a preliminary issue on the Attorney General of Canada and the Attorney General of Ontario. The Attorney General of Canada did not respond and the Attorney General of Ontario simply advised the Applicant that constitutional

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from