Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2011

Reference Re Assisted Human Reproduction Act

On December 22, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered a divided 4-4-1 decision in Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

2010 SCC 61 (Released 22 December 2010)

Constitutional Law – Division of Powers – Federal Jurisdiction Over Criminal Law – Provincial Jurisdiction over Property and Civil Rights

On December 22, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered a divided 4-4-1 decision in Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act. At issue was whether the impugned provisions, sections 8 to 19, 40 to 53, 60, 61 and 68 of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act, S.C. 2004, c.2, exceeded Parliament's authority to enact criminal law under s. 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867. The impetus for the legislation in question was the 1989 Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (the "Baird Commission"), a report which made recommendations for federal legislation to address the concerns about certain practices in the field of assisted human reproduction. While conceding that the legislation contained certain provisions that were valid criminal law, the Attorney General of Quebec

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from