Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 FEBRUARY 2011

R. v. Caron

Here the Supreme Court held that Superior Courts can make interim costs awards to fund public interest litigation in the inferior provincial courts.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

2011 SCC 5 (Released February 4, 2011)

Constitutional Law – Interim Costs Awards – Inherent Jurisdiction of the Courts – Inferior Courts

Here the Supreme Court held that Superior Courts can make interim costs awards to fund public interest litigation in the inferior provincial courts.

In the underlying litigation, the Respondent Caron had challenged the constitutional validity of Alberta Provincial Court proceedings on the basis that the court documents were solely in English. Caron pleaded that the provisions of the Alberta Languages Act, which purported to abrogate French Language rights in order to permit such unilingual documents, was unconstitutional.

At issue in the Supreme Court of Canada was the funding of Caron's litigation. The Provincial Court had made an interim costs order – an "Okanagan order", so named after the case which enables them – in favour of Caron. The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench ("ACQB") set aside this order on the ground that the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from