Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2022

The New Framework For Relocating Children In Mobility Applications

In Gordon v Goertz ([1996] 2 SCR 27) ("Gordon"), the Supreme Court of Canada drafted a framework for mobility applications.

CanadaFamily and Matrimonial

In Gordon v Goertz ([1996] 2 SCR 27) ("Gordon"), the Supreme Court of Canada drafted a framework for mobility applications. Since Gordon, Canadian courts have applied and refined the Gordon framework. In 2019, the Divorce Act was amended to codify the framework found in Gordon and the subsequent refinements found in Canadian jurisprudence.

The Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 ("Barendregt") decision provided the Supreme Court of Canada with an opportunity to clarify the common law framework in accordance with the Divorce Act.

The Supreme Court held that the "crucial question" in mobility applications is "whether relocation is in the best interests of the child, having regard to the child's physical, emotional and psychological safety, security and well-being" (Barendregt at para 152).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from