Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2021

Yukon Zinc: Reining In The Ability To Disclaim Contracts And Priority For Environmental Liabilities

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

We previously discussed the Court's decision in Yukon (Government of) v Yukon Zinc Corporation, 2020 YKSC 16, which opened the door to partial termination of agreements in a receivership...

CanadaEnvironment

We previously discussed the Court's decision in Yukon (Government of) v Yukon Zinc Corporation, 2020 YKSC 16, which opened the door to partial termination of agreements in a receivership, an action generally considered to not be permitted in the past. The effect of which on the facts before the Court, was to provide the receiver with access to certain equipment for the purpose of carrying out environmental reclamation at a zinc-silver-lead mine known as the Wolverine Mine at a cost less than required under the lease agreement.

On March 5, 2021, the Court of Appeal issued a unanimous decision overturning the decision permitting the partial termination and made other findings which have provided some clarity regarding the priority of environmental obligations in a receivership.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from