Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JUNE 2015

Purchaser Of Contaminated Site Loses Case Against Own Lawyer

I continue to be surprised by how many people knowingly purchase a contaminated site, and regret it afterwards. Buy in haste, repent at leisure?

CanadaEnvironment

I continue to be surprised by how many people knowingly purchase a contaminated site, and regret it afterwards. Buy in haste, repent at leisure?

Sometimes the purchaser of a contaminated site is merely unlucky, or suffers from a change of rules or approach by government regulators; sometimes I see incompetence by purchasers' consultants, and/or lawyers. But sometimes the problem is due to the purchasers themselves.

In 6038212 Canada Inc. v. 1230367 Ontario Ltd., 2014 ONCA 415, a Mr. Yang (an experienced businessman and PhD chemist) bought a commercial plaza. The property was contaminated by tetrachloroethylene (perc) from a dry cleaners' that had been operated by a former tenant. Chlorinated solvent contamination of soil and groundwater is common at drycleaning sites and can be astonishingly expensive to remediate.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from