Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JANUARY 2012

Inco Update: Supreme Court Of Canada To Consider Hearing Nickel Emissions Case

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

An application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") has been filed in the Inco case by Port Colborne, Ontario property owners.

CanadaEnvironment

An application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") has been filed in the Inco case by Port Colborne, Ontario property owners. After initially being awarded $36 million for diminished property values due to nickel deposits in their soils, the claimants' win was reversed late last year by the Ontario Court of Appeal1.

The SCC leave application raises several issues said to be of public importance including:

1. What is the threshold for nuisance liability in the context of environmental contamination? In particular, is stigma a recognizable head of damage to land under Canadian law?

2. How should common law nuisance liability be considered in relation to statutory standards for contamination?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from