Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2019

Environmental Class Action — Evidence Deemed Sufficiently Specific To Allow Collective Recovery In The "Red Dust" Case

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Judgment on the merits in the "red dust" case, Lalande c. Compagnie d'arrimage de Québec et al., 2019 QCCS 306 (CanLII) was rendered on February 5 last.

CanadaEnvironment

Judgment on the merits in the "red dust" case, Lalande c. Compagnie d'arrimage de Québec et al., 2019 QCCS 306 (CanLII) was rendered on February 5 last.

After carrying out a minute analysis of the evidence, Mr. Justice Pierre Ouellet, J.C.S., subdivided the geographic boundaries of the class action area into separate zones, and then went on to determine whether the plaintiff had succeeded in adducing sufficient proof of a common injury to the class members to justify a collective, as opposed to a purely individual, recovery of the compensation to be awarded.

Summary of the Facts

In October 2012, a reddish dust started appearing in a residential neighbourhood in Québec City's Lower Town. Some of the residents noticed the dust accumulating on their balconies, vehicles and door and window frames. Following that occurrence, a number of them proceeded to clean up their homes and/or belongings. Some of them then started to worry about the potential effects of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from