Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2013

Death Of Environmental Class Actions Post-"Inco" - Well, Maybe Not Quite Yet…

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Last year BLG’s Environmental Law Cross-Country Check-Up discussed the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in "Smith v. Inco".

CanadaEnvironment

Last year BLG's Environmental Law Cross-Country Check-Up discussed the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Smith v. Inco, which dismissed the plaintiff's class action. Inco dealt with historic nickel contamination in the soils of Port Colborne over decades of smelting. During the past year, the class unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Inco was the first common law environmental class action trial in Canada. Ultimately, the class was unable to satisfy the Court of Appeal it had suffered "actual, substantial and physical harm". Chemical alteration of the soil was not viewed as compensable damage. Indeed, a $1.7 million costs award has been granted against the Class Proceedings Fund as a result of the action's failure. Moving forward, stigma claims will be much more difficult to win.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from