Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2012

Creditor Or Regulator? Nortel, The MOE And Environment V Insolvency

"Insolvency statutes such as the Canadian Creditors Arrangement Act and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act do not mesh very well with environmental legislation".

CanadaEnvironment

"Insolvency statutes such as the Canadian Creditors Arrangement Act and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act do not mesh very well with environmental legislation". Across the country, courts are grappling with the messy conflicts between insolvency law and environmental statutes. Can provincial environmental ministries use their regulatory powers to force the funds of insolvent organizations to be spent on environmental cleanups, in priority to the claims of creditors, pensioners, employees, and others?

In Re Nortel, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment proposed to use Directors' Orders to force Nortel to spend at least $18 million on investigating and remediating chlorinated solvent contamination on properties long since sold, and no longer used by Nortel. In at least one case, the contamination predated Nortel's original acquisition of the property.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from