Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2016

B.C. Environmental Appeal Board Rejects Precautionary Principle In Favour Of "Cautious Approach"

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The Board also concluded that the EMA does not, expressly or impliedly, require the Ministry to consider the cumulative effects of emissions from other facilities.

CanadaEnvironment

In a recent decision upholding an air permit amendment issued to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. (Rio Tinto) for the expansion of its smelter in Kitimat, the British Columbia Environmental Appeal Board (Board) ruled on a number of key principles applicable to the assessment of waste permit applications by the B.C. Ministry of Environment (Ministry) under the Environmental Management Act (EMA). Of particular note, the Board rejected the application of the precautionary principle in favour of a less stringent "cautious approach", and confirmed that the Ministry is not required to include cumulative effects in its consideration of permit applications.

This decision makes it clear that rigorous and scientifically defensible technical analysis of the impact of proposed emissions on human health and the environment is critical to successful permit applications. However, the determination that some impacts will occur is not a bar to obtaining a permit or amendment, provided it can be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from