Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2012

Challenge To Changes In The Feed-in Tariff Program Dismissed By Divisional Court

In its recent decision in SkyPower CL I LP et al v Minister of Energy issued on September 10, 2012, the Divisional Court dismissed the Applicants’ assertions that the Minister of Energy and the Ontario Power Authority (the OPA) had acted unreasonably in failing to process applications in accordance with the Feed-in Tariff (the FIT) rules and that the changes to the FIT rules were unfair, discriminatory, and ultra vires the enabling legislation.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Introduction

In its recent decision in SkyPower CL I LP et al v Minister of Energy issued on September 10, 2012,1the Divisional Court dismissed the Applicants' assertions that the Minister of Energy and the Ontario Power Authority (the OPA) had acted unreasonably in failing to process applications in accordance with the Feed-in Tariff (the FIT) rules and that the changes to the FIT rules were unfair, discriminatory, and ultra vires the enabling legislation.2 The application for judicial review, brought by 118 affiliated limited partnerships (the Applicants) that had submitted applications under the FIT program, was dismissed in its entirety.

Background

In May 2009, the Ontario government brought into force the Green Energy Act, 2009 (GEA) and amendments to the Electricity Act, 1998 to allow for the development of a Feed-in Tariff (FIT) program for the streamlined approval and contracting of renewable energy projects such as wind and solar farms. Under the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from