Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2018

Medical Cannabis & Undue Hardship

Integritas Workplace Law Corporation
Explore more from Integritas Workplace Law Corporation

The Grievor applied for the position of Utility Person on the Churchill project with the Employer.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In the recent decision of Lower Churchill Transmission Construction Employers' Association and IBEW, Local 1620, arbitrator John Roil, QC, dismissed a grievance where an employer, Valard Construction LP (the "Employer") refused to hire an employee using medical cannabis, on the basis of undue hardship.

Background

The Grievor applied for the position of Utility Person on the Churchill project with the Employer. The Grievor used medical cannabis to manage pain relating to osteoarthritis and Crohn's Disease. The medical cannabis had been prescribed by the Grievor's physician after attempts at treating his pain with conventional treatments had been unsuccessful. The Grievor ingested 1.5 grams of cannabis at a THC level of less than 20% each evening, through vaporization.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from