Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 NOVEMBER 2013

Grievor To Be Identified – Again

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Another Arbitrator in BC has decided against a general rule of anonymizing the names of grievors and witnesses in labour arbitration awards.

CanadaEmployment and HR

No General Rule to Anonymize Names

Another Arbitrator in BC has decided against a general rule of anonymizing the names of grievors and witnesses in labour arbitration awards.  The decision of Arbitator Stan Lanyon in the Sunrise Poultry case (Unreported, October 28, 2013) is the case we anticipated in our previous post on this issue.

Like Arbitrator John Sanderson in the Husband Food Ventures case, Arbitrator Lanyon was dealing with a request by the United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 1518 to have the names of the grievor and witnesses remain confidential in any Award in the matter.  And like Arbitrator Sanderson, Arbitrator Lanyon decided there should be no such blanket rule.  Instead, the general rule should be in favour of disclosure, with Arbitrators retaining the discretion to anonymize the names of grievors and witnesses when circumstances demand it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from