Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2012

Frustration – Part 2

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In an earlier post here, we spoke about the possibility of alleging frustration of contract when an employee is absent for a lengthy period due to illness or disability.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In an earlier post here, we spoke about the possibility of alleging frustration of contract when an employee is absent for a lengthy period due to illness or disability.  The doctrine was also recently relied upon outside the disability context to terminate an employee whose criminal conviction prevented him from obtaining the necessary license to continue working as a security guard.

Cowie v. Great Blue Heron Charity Casino is an Ontario case where the employee worked as a security officer in a casino from 2000. In 2007, Ontario enacted legislation requiring a security guard in a casino to hold a licence. A "clean criminal record" is needed to obtain the licence.  Cowie did not have a clean criminal record and he was terminated. The employer said the employment contract was "frustrated" because it could not be performed due to an unexpected event that neither party anticipated.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from