Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2024

Confidentiality Limited: When Anonymous Whistleblowers Must Be Identified

In Jarvis v The Toronto-Dominion Bank ("Jarvis"), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ("Court") ordered that a complainant's identity be disclosed in the context of a wrongful dismissal lawsuit...

CanadaEmployment and HR

Bottom Line

In Jarvis v The Toronto-Dominion Bank ("Jarvis"), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ("Court") ordered that a complainant's identity be disclosed in the context of a wrongful dismissal lawsuit, despite promises of confidentiality extended during a workplace investigation. The employer, TD Bank, claimed it had just cause to terminate the plaintiff employee based on anonymous complaints and a confidential investigation into those complaints. Although TD Bank promised the whistleblower and complainants that their identities would remain confidential, the Court ordered it to disclose the unredacted complaints and investigation report.

This case reveals a tension between the public interest in transparency, and the potential chilling effect of revealing the identity of whistleblowers or complainants in the workplace.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from