Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 NOVEMBER 2019

Fraudulent Dealings: Why A Mutual Release May Not Be Iron-Clad

It has long been a routine part of the settlement of a matter or the severance of an employee to exchange mutual release agreements. These releases typically provide that both parties...

CanadaCriminal Law

It has long been a routine part of the settlement of a matter or the severance of an employee to exchange mutual release agreements. These releases typically provide that both parties to a dispute agree to give up all legal claims, whether or not these claims are known at the time of signing, that they may have against each other.

From an employer perspective, obtaining a release from a departing employee allows you to close your file and know that should the employee come back later with a further claim, you have a shield. However, giving such a release to a departing employee also significantly limits an employer's recourses when issues are discovered postdeparture.

While the release might be upheld in some circumstances, recent case law, stemming from the Ontario Court of Appeal, York University v Markicevic, 2018 ONCA 893, indicates that a mutual release agreement can be set aside when a party makes a fraudulent misrepresentation, ultimately inducing the other

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from