Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 OCTOBER 2013

SCC Refuses Leave To Appeal D&O Coverage Case

The Supreme Court of Canada recently refused leave to appeal the decision in "Onex Corporation et al. v. American Home Assurance Company et al".

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

The Supreme Court of Canada recently refused leave to appeal the decision in Onex Corporation et al. v. American Home Assurance Company et al, 2013 ONCA 117, a case where the Ontario Court of Appeal had provided guidance on a number of important issues in the context of director and officer insurance policies. In particular, the court addressed the adequacy of notice of claims under a prior notice provision, the proper interpretation of an "insured vs. insured" exclusion clause and "reasonable expectations" in the context of a unique fact pattern.

The Onex Action

In this coverage dispute (the "Onex Action"), Onex Corporation claimed they were entitled to payment of (very substantial) defence costs pursuant to the primary and excess D&O policies for an action commenced against them (and others) in the state of Georgia in 2005 (the "Georgia Action"). Onex incorporated Magnatrax Corporation ("Magnatrax") as a subsidiary in 1999. The Georgia Action arose out of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from