Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2018

Observations From The Eco Oro Proxy Contest

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

Today marks the first anniversary of the start of what was likely the most acrimonious proxy fight in Canada in 2017.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Today marks the first anniversary of the start of what was likely the most acrimonious proxy fight in Canada in 2017. On February 10, 2017, Harrington Global Opportunities Fund Ltd. and Courtenay Wolfe 1 (collectively, the "Shareholder Group") requisitioned a shareholders' meeting to replace each of the six incumbent directors of Eco Oro Minerals Corp. ("Eco Oro" or the "Company"). On August 1, 2017, following nine separate proceedings2 brought before courts and securities regulators, the parties announced a settlement agreement that put an end to the proxy contest. In this paper, we will highlight some of the key findings arising out of the various proceedings, relating to the Company's impugned issuance of common shares, and will discuss the main takeaways and the practical implications for issuers, investors and securities law practitioners.3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from