Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2012

Nominet Web Dispute Resolution Procedure Scrutinized

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In a case destined to be read in the future only by lawyer geeks and those interested in the ‘access to justice’ camp, Mr. Justice Mann ruled that Nominet’s Dispute Resolution Service and the relevant policy and procedures effectively prevented a party, which had used the procedure, from having the dispute heard again by the High Court.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In a case destined to be read in the future only by lawyer geeks and those interested in the 'access to justice' camp, Mr. Justice Mann ruled that Nominet's Dispute Resolution Service and the relevant policy and procedures effectively prevented a party, which had used the procedure, from having the dispute heard again by the High Court.

Background

Those of you who have had disputes relating to domain names, will no doubt have appreciated the cheaper procedure available through Nominet's DRS policy, rather than have to litigate the matter in Court. As you will be aware, all disputes relating to '.co.uk' domain names must go via this route, whereas '.com' are dealt with WIPO's own dispute procedure. However, there are similarities between the two approaches.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from