Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2026

Fisher v. Airfoam Industries Ltd. (Quad-Lock Building System)

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Fisher bought insulated concrete foam products from Quad-Lock Building Systems (Quad-Lock). Quad-Lock's sales order forms, signed electronically by Fisher, referred to the "Terms and Conditions of Sale"...

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

British Columbia Court held that arbitration terms incorporated by reference through online terms of sale were enforceable and not “inoperative” where the buyer signed order forms referring to those terms.

Facts

Fisher bought insulated concrete foam products from Quad-Lock Building Systems (Quad-Lock). Quad-Lock's sales order forms, signed electronically by Fisher, referred to the “Terms and Conditions of Sale” on the seller's website, which contained a mandatory arbitration clause. Fisher sued in court alleging the goods were defective. Quad-Lock sought a stay in favour of arbitration under section 8 of the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Act (“ICAA”), relying on the arbitration clause in those online terms. Fisher argued the clause was “inoperative” because the parties had a shared assumption that they would litigate in court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from