Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2016

Early Cybersecurity Derivative Actions Miss Target

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

As derivative actions against the principals of corporate targets of cyber attacks are in their infancy in Canada, there is relatively little to guide an understanding of the magnitude of threat they pose...

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

As derivative actions against the principals of corporate targets of cyber attacks are in their infancy in Canada, there is relatively little to guide an understanding of the magnitude of threat they pose to Canadian directors and officers. Recent case law in the U.S. may well provide Canadian companies—and courts—with a glimpse of the future. For example, in early July 2016 a U.S. derivative action against Target Corporation was dismissed, joining a short list of failed U.S. actions against directors and officers for breaches of corporate cybersecurity.1 In addition to highlighting the difficulty of advancing derivative actions for such breaches, the Target case offers some interesting insights into how companies, directors and officers should behave in anticipating and responding to probably-inevitable cyber breaches. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from