Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MAY 2011

Does The Left Hand Know What The Right Hand Is Doing?

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

This is the unfortunate tale of two decisions concerning the tort of unlawful interference with economic relations: "Barber v. Molson Sport & Entertainment Inc.", 2010 ONCA 70 (CanLII) released September 3, 2010, just 10 days after "Alleslev-Krofchak v. Valcom Limited", 2010 ONCA 557 (CanLII) was released on August 24.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

This is the unfortunate tale of two decisions concerning the tort of unlawful interference with economic relations: Barber v. Molson Sport & Entertainment Inc., 2010 ONCA 70 (CanLII) released September 3, 2010, just 10 days after Alleslev-Krofchak v. Valcom Limited, 2010 ONCA 557 (CanLII) was released on August 24. The puzzling problem is that the two panels (which shared a common member) have left up in the air the proper meaning of "by unlawful means," a key element in the test as to this intentional tort. Both these cases were heard in March 2010.

As Sgt. Joe Friday of Dragnet fame said: "The facts, Ma'am — just give me the facts." The appellate courts are not there to retry the case under appeal, but rather to correct for errors of law and misapprehension of material facts. In Barber, the Court of Appeal made a preliminary comment in its analysis:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from