Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JULY 2025

Dionne C. HEXO Corp.: When Proof Is In The Pudding

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Dionne c. HEXO Corp., the Quebec Court of Appeal continued a growing trend in which Canadian courts appear increasingly willing to dismiss unmeritorious class proceedings early on...

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Background

In Dionne c. HEXO Corp., the Quebec Court of Appeal continued a growing trend in which Canadian courts appear increasingly willing to dismiss unmeritorious class proceedings early on, despite the low evidentiary threshold at authorization and certification.

Decision in HEXO Corp.

The plaintiff commenced statutory and civil primary and secondary misrepresentation claims alleging that HEXO Corp. ("HEXO"), a cannabis producer, misled the market in two respects: (i) by representing, in virtue of a purchase agreement with the Société des alcools du Québec ("SAQ"), that it was guaranteed a certain amount of revenue; and (ii) by representing that its Niagara cannabis facility was fully licensed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from