Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2012

Commercial Litigation Bulletin: Volume 2 - Number 3

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In three decisions released together—"Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda", 2012 SCC 17; "Les Éditions Écosociété Inc. v. Banro Corp.", 2012 SCC 18, and "Breeden v. Black", 2012 SCC 19—the Supreme Court has decisively changed the way Canadian courts will approach assumption of jurisdiction over defendants in future inter-jurisdictional tort cases. In these landmark decisions, the Court has articulated the outlines of a judicial code defining the ambit of the ‘real and substantial connection test,’ a

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Edited by James Tumbridge

In this issue:

  • Supreme Court Simplifies and Clarifies Assumption of Personal Jurisdiction
  • Conflicts of Interest in Complex Investment Structures for Energy, Infrastructure and Mining Assets - The Evolution of The Business Judgement Rule in Canada and Delaware
  • Costs in Summary Judgement: E Discovery costs are an established head



Supreme Court Simplifies and Clarifies Assumption of Personal Jurisdiction

By: Malcolm Ruby and Evan Atwood

In three decisions released together—Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17; Les Éditions Écosociété Inc. v. Banro Corp., 2012 SCC 18, and Breeden v. Black, 2012 SCC 19—the Supreme Court has decisively changed the way Canadian courts will approach assumption of jurisdiction over defendants in future inter-jurisdictional tort cases. In these landmark decisions, the Court has articulated the outlines of a judicial code defining the ambit of the 'real and substantial

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from