Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2021

Limitation Periods And COVID-19: Where Do Things Stand?

WeirFoulds LLP
Explore more from WeirFoulds LLP

Courts across Canada shut down for a period of time in 2020 to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Several provinces and one territory suspended limitation periods in civil matters during that time...

CanadaCoronavirus (COVID-19)
Marie-Pier Nadeau
Marie-Pier Nadeau
Author LinkedIn connections

Courts across Canada shut down for a period of time in 2020 to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Several provinces and one territory suspended limitation periods in civil matters during that time and, in some cases, for some time after courts resumed their operations. The suspension orders have since been lifted across the country (except in Yukon), and you may be left wondering how to compute the "new" limitation periods. This article presents an overview of the situation for all provinces and territories.

It is anticipated that the various suspension orders' effects will be felt for many years. Many issues will certainly arise regarding time limit calculations. As such, the preferable course of conduct would be to abide by any "original" limitation period, if possible.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Coldcard Exploit: Why Victims May Have Two Routes To Recovery

A five-year-old firmware defect in Coldcard hardware wallets has enabled attackers to systematically drain an estimated $116 million in Bitcoin from over 5,200 victims since July 2026. This unprecedented exploit raises critical questions about manufacturer liability and creates two distinct legal pathways for recovery: blockchain tracing against the perpetrators and potential litigation against Canadian manufacturer Coinkite for product defects that undermined the fundamental security promise of devices mar
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
WeirFoulds LLP
WeirFoulds LLP
Article

Here’s The Drill: Introducing The New CCDC 32 – 2026 Progressive Design-Build Contract

CCDC 32 introduces a progressive design-build framework that allows owners and design-builders to collaboratively develop project scope, budget, and schedule before committing to a final price. Through a two-phase structure with project gates and off-ramp provisions, this standardized contract addresses complex construction projects where requirements cannot be fully defined at the outset. How does this collaborative approach balance flexibility with cost certainty while reshaping traditional roles in const
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
WeirFoulds LLP
WeirFoulds LLP
Article

Who Pays After The Hack? Emerging Paths For Cyber Recovery

Recent court decisions reveal a developing area of cyber insurance subrogation where insurers can potentially recover losses from vendors, financial institutions, and service providers who failed to meet specific cybersecurity obligations. These cases demonstrate that a cybercriminal's involvement does not automatically shield third parties from liability when they breach contractual duties or ignore red flags that contributed to the loss.
United StatesInsurance
WeirFoulds LLP
WeirFoulds LLP