Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 APRIL 2026

Ex Parte, Not Carte Blanche: The FCA Pushes Back On Overbroad Section 11 Requests

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The Federal Court of Appeal recently upheld limits on the Competition Bureau's investigative powers, ruling that production orders under the Competition Act must be reasonable in scope and cannot be excessively broad or burdensome. This decision arose from the Bureau's investigation into Amazon's handling of fake product reviews, where the court rejected a data request covering billions of products as insufficiently justified and disproportionate.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

Nobody can credibly disagree that the Competition Bureau (the “Bureau”) should be able to obtain market information to further its investigations. But when those requests become unreasonable – seeking, for example, data fields involving billions of products – limits must be set and the Bureau must respect those limits.

The courts recently conveyed that message to the Bureau, when the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) dismissed the Commissioner of Competition’s (the “Commissioner”) appeal over the Federal Court’s refusal to grant part of a section 11 production order against Amazon.com.ca, ULC and Amzn Mobile LLC (collectively, “Amazon”). The decisions confirm that production orders under the Competition Act (the “Act”) are not carte blanche – they remain discretionary and must be reasonable in scope.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from