Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

PODCAST · 03 MAY 2024

Wrapping It Up (Podcast)

In the recent decision of CF v DLG, the BVI Commercial Court held that a two-step process is to be preferred over the use of âwrap up ordersâ in Norwich Pharmacal proceedings.

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Episode Description

In the recent decision of CF v DLG, the BVI Commercial Court held that a two-step process is to be preferred over the use of âwrap up ordersâ in Norwich Pharmacal proceedings. The applicant, a judgment creditor, sought Norwich Pharmacal relief against registered agency service providers to the judgment debtor, for information to assist with considering its enforcement options.

The BVI Court observed that âavid debateâ had arisen over whether an application for a seal and gag order and for Norwich Pharmacal relief should be determined at a single ex parte âwrap upâ hearing or whether a two-step approach should be preferred. The two-step approach involves first determining the seal and gag part of the application ex parte (which can often be done on the papers), and then, if the seal and gag is granted, the Norwich Pharmacal part of the application proceeds on notice.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from