Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2024

The Effect Of Non-Disclosure In Unfair Prejudice Claims

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

A successful party to a buy-out order made in the course of unfair prejudice proceedings can find themselves in a difficult position, at the hands of an uncooperative respondent.

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A successful party to a buy-out order made in the course of unfair prejudice proceedings can find themselves in a difficult position, at the hands of an uncooperative respondent. Commonly, the Court will try liability and quantum issues separately in such claims in the British Virgin Islands.

If the applicant shareholder succeeds in obtaining an order that their shareholding be bought out, the respondent majority controllers of the company may have little incentive to give proper disclosure of the financial position of the company, sufficient to enable the Court to fix the appropriate price which the majority are required to pay.

Such was the fact pattern in Ng Min Hing v Soemarlie Lie (JCPC 2023/0118, decided 10 April 2024). Before the Board was an application by the Defendant, Mr. Ng for permission to appeal an unless order made against him by the BVI Commercial Court in November 2022. The unless order was made in the face of Mr. Ng's refusal to provide any

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from