Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JUNE 2013

Futter v HMRC And Pitt v HMRC: An Offshore Perspective

Appleby
Appleby
Contributor
Appleby

Appleby

Appleby is a leading offshore law firm. The team of legal specialists advise global public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Appleby

The Supreme Court of England and Wales recently handed down its judgment in the jointly heard appeals of Futter v HMRC and Pitt v HMRC [2013] UKSC 26.

BermudaWealth Management

On 9 May 2013 the Supreme Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment in the jointly heard appeals of Futter v HMRC and Pitt v HMRC [2013] UKSC 26. The judgment has provided the courts of England and Wales with certainty on the so-called "rule in Hastings-Bass" and on the setting aside of voluntary dispositions on the grounds of mistake.

The judgment does not have a direct impact upon offshore jurisdictions, but those working in the fiduciary industry will inevitably wish to take note of the Supreme Court's decision, of the potential for offshore courts to follow suit and of the possible legislative responses. This article seeks to explain the key findings of the Supreme Court and what they may mean for those working offshore.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from