Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 DECEMBER 2024

RHTB Case: Where VAT And Contract Law Disagree?

Loyens & Loeff
Loyens & Loeff
Contributor
Loyens & Loeff

Loyens & Loeff

One firm: Law and Tax Loyens & Loeff is a leading independent, full-service law and tax firm in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Loyens & Loeff

On 28 November 2024, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in the RHTB case (C-622/23). This judgment, eagerly awaited by tax professionals, confirmed the trend of recent years...

BelgiumTax

On 28 November 2024, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in the RHTB case (C-622/23). This judgment, eagerly awaited by tax professionals, confirmed the trend of recent years to include contractual 'compensations' within the scope of VAT.

Facts

In March 2018, RHTB – an Austrian company – entered into a works contract for the construction of a drywall. However, after the works had commenced, the client informed RHTB that it no longer required its services and terminated the contract.

RHTB brought an action for unjustified termination before the court and sought compensation of the contractually agreed amounts from the client. After confirming the obligation to pay the termination fees, the question before the court remained whether VAT should be applied to these amounts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from