ARTICLE · 10 JUNE 2026

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: Key Updates

Loyens & Loeff

Contributor

Loyens & Loeff

One firm: Law and Tax Loyens & Loeff is a leading independent, full-service law and tax firm in...

View firm profile

Explore more from Loyens & Loeff

The International Chamber of Commerce has unveiled its 2026 Arbitration Rules, marking a significant shift in how international arbitrations will be conducted. With the removal of mandatory Terms of Reference...

BelgiumLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Hakim Boularbah

Tom Claassens

Olivier van der Haegen

+2 more

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has introduced its 2026 Arbitration Rules, effective from 1 June 2026, aimed at enhancing efficiency, clarity and user-friendliness in response to evolving arbitration practice.

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: Key Updates

The ICC has introduced its revised 2026 Arbitration Rules, effective from 1 June 2026, continuing its efforts to modernise arbitral proceedings. The new ICC Rules apply to all arbitrations commenced on or after that date, unless the parties agree otherwise.

One of the most significant structural changes is the departure from the Terms of Reference, which are no longer mandatory. The initial Case Management Conference takes a more prominent role in shaping the proceedings and establishing the procedural timetable. It remains mandatory and must be held within 30 days from receiving the file from the Secretariat (Article 24).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: Key Updates

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: Key Updates

Related Articles

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules: 5 Key Changes

The Circulation Of Judgments Between Belgium And The United Kingdom: Towards A New Balance Under The 2019 Hague Judgments Convention?

ECJ Affirms Stronger Judicial Oversight In Sports Arbitration

French Court Rejects Attempt To Use Civil Code To Usurp Brussels Recast Principles On Jurisdiction

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

International Arbitration

Litigation

Class Actions

See more popular content from

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules: 5 Key Changes

The CEPANI 2026 Arbitration Rules

Damage Under The New Belgian Tort Law

EU Court Of Justice Rules On Issues Of Lis Pendens And Jurisdiction Under Lugano Convention

Belgian Court Rules On Recognition Of U.S. Class Action Settlements

ECJ Affirms Stronger Judicial Oversight In Sports Arbitration

Recast Brussels I Regulation: The Abolition Of Exequatur And The Amendment To Rules Relating To The Enforceability Of Jurisdiction Clause

Court Of Justice Of European Union Sets Aside General Court Judgments Granting Damages For Excessively Long Judicial Proceedings

New EU Legislation on Environmental Liability

French Court Rejects Attempt To Use Civil Code To Usurp Brussels Recast Principles On Jurisdiction

OECD Releases New Pillar Two Guidance, Updated GIR And Framework For Legislative Reviews

Europe Steps Up Antitrust Enforcement Against Algorithmic Pricing

Digital Omnibus: What The Proposed Changes Mean For GDPR, Privacy And Cookies

EU Digital Regulations: Key Takeaways For Global Companies

EU AI Act: Key Amendments Adopted Under The Digital Omnibus Package

Capital Gains Tax In Belgium Becomes Reality As Of 1 January 2026

New EU Rules On Withdrawing From Online Contracts

Introduction Of A New Swiss Transparency Register

The European Commission Opens Formal Antitrust Investigation Into Red Bull For Exclusionary Abuse

Banking Regulation 2026