ARTICLE · 31 JULY 2024

2024 Summer Olympics Series: Belgium

Littler Mendelson

Explore more from Littler Mendelson

Belgium thus hosted the Summer Olympics for the first (and last) time in 1920.

BelgiumEmployment and HR

Anne-Valérie Michaux

Author LinkedIn connections

The 2024 Summer Olympic Games began Friday, July 26. To celebrate this international event, Littler offices around the globe will share key changes in labor and employment laws that have transpired since the last time their countries hosted the Olympic games.¹

Due to the First World War, the 1916 Olympic Games were cancelled. When the question arose as to which country should host the 1920 edition, it was decided, as a tribute to the suffering and bravery of the Belgians during the war, that this privilege should go to Belgium.

Belgium thus hosted the Summer Olympics for the first (and last) time in 1920. It was at these Games that two major symbols made their appearance: the Olympic flag designed by Baron Pierre de Coubertin and the Olympic oath taken for the first time by Belgian athlete Victor Boin.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Mandatory Registration Of Working Time As Of 2027: The Clock Is Ticking

BelgiumEmployment and HR

Be Aware – October 2026

BelgiumEmployment and HR

What Does An Ageing Population Mean For The Labour Market?

BelgiumEmployment and HR

The 2028 Social Elections: Should You Already Be Doing Something Now?

BelgiumEmployment and HR

Restructuring: Key Dos And Don’ts For Employers

BelgiumEmployment and HR

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

Comparative Guide

Employee Incentives

Comparative Guide

Technology Outsourcing

See more popular content from

Employment and HR

Global Mobility In 2026: Four Trends Redefining Strategy, Risk And Resilience

These shifts are increasing both transparency and risk, with closer monitoring of visitor activity, evolving 'permanent establishment' rules...

GlobalEmployment and HR

EU Talent Pool Regulation: New Framework Takes Effect In June 2026

On 12 May 2026, the EU Talent Pool Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

European UnionEmployment and HR

Workplace AI In APAC: Regulation And The Direction Of Travel

Artificial intelligence is transforming workforce management across Asia-Pacific, yet most jurisdictions rely on existing employment and data protection laws rather than AI-specific legislation. Governments supplement these frameworks with ethical principles and voluntary guidance, though recent developments in Australia and Malaysia suggest a shift toward more targeted oversight of AI systems that significantly impact workers.

GlobalEmployment and HR

The Classification Conundrum: Logging Onto The Gig Economy II

The question of employment classification continues to shape how countries regulate digital platform work. In responding to this challenge, jurisdictions are taking different paths.

GlobalEmployment and HR

EU Pay Transparency Directive: Which Countries Have Transposed?

The EU Pay Transparency Directive mandates that employers with over 100 workers regularly report detailed gender pay gap information, with strict timelines to address disparities of 5% or more. The Directive also grants employees and job candidates significant pay transparency rights, including access to salary ranges and comparative pay data. This interactive map tracks the transposition status of the Directive across European Member States as the June 2026 deadline approaches.

European UnionEmployment and HR

EU Pay Transparency Transposition: Belgium Implements Public Sector Portion, Private Sector Still To Come

Belgium has partially implemented the EU Pay Transparency Directive for its public sector, but private-sector employers await comprehensive federal legislation. While the transposition timeline remains uncertain, the Directive provides a clear framework for anticipated requirements including recruitment transparency, objective pay structures, employee information rights, and gender pay gap reporting that employers should begin preparing for now.

European UnionEmployment and HR

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Managing Restructurings In APAC: Legal, Practical And People Considerations

Restructuring exercises in Malaysia, Singapore and India require careful attention to legal compliance, employee communication and procedural fairness. Through analysis of recent case law including Lazada, AirAsia X and Salunkhe decisions, this article examines how poor execution can trigger regulatory scrutiny, reputational damage and costly reinstatement orders.

GlobalEmployment and HR

Youth In The Digital Age: Challenges And Opportunities

As digital transformation accelerates and AI reshapes the workplace, young workers face mounting challenges in acquiring relevant skills and securing entry-level positions. This analysis examines how technological evolution, remote work dynamics, and AI-driven recruitment are creating new barriers for youth employment, while highlighting innovative government initiatives across Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific that are helping bridge the digital skills gap.

BelgiumEmployment and HR

Is Employment Law Ready For AI?

This report concerns the use of artificial intelligence through the life cycle of employment: from recruitment, through management of work processes, to dismissal decisions.

GlobalEmployment and HR

Getting Restructuring Right In Australia And New Zealand: FAQs For Employers

Employers planning workforce reductions in Australia and New Zealand face distinct legal frameworks that require careful navigation. While both jurisdictions mandate genuine business reasons and employee consultation, critical differences in timing, process requirements, and redeployment obligations can significantly impact restructuring outcomes. Understanding these nuances is essential for organizations managing cross-border redundancy programs to minimize legal risk and operational disruption.

GlobalEmployment and HR