Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2023

VBB On Competition Law | Volume 2023, NO 3

Van Bael & Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis
Contributor
Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm headquartered in Brussels with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Van Bael & Bellis

On 16 March 2023, the Court of Justice (ECJ) issued a preliminary ruling in case C-449/21, ...

BelgiumAntitrust/Competition Law

MERGER CONTROL

European Union level

Court of Justice confirms ex-post application of abuse of dominance rules to non-notifiable mergers

On 16 March 2023, the Court of Justice (ECJ) issued a preliminary ruling in case C-449/21, Towercast SASU v. Autorité de la concurrence and others ("Towercast") finding that concentrations that are not subject to any ex-ante notification requirement under national or EU merger control rules may nonetheless be subject to an ex-post abuse of dominance review by a national competition authority pursuant to Article 102 TFEU.

The ruling arose from a question posed to the ECJ by the Paris Court of Appeal, which was considering a complaint to the French Competition Authority (FCA) lodged in 2017 by Towercast, a television transmission service provider. Towercast's rival, TDF Infrastructure (TDF), had acquired Itas, the only other competitor active on the market, in a deal that did not trigger either EU or French national merger

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from