Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2011

VBB on Competition Law

Van Bael & Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis
Contributor
Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm headquartered in Brussels with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Van Bael & Bellis

The OFT’s decision follows a judgment of the EU General Court of 6 July 2010 in which the Court found that Ryanair’s minority shareholding in Aer Lingus did not give rise to a situation of "control" for the purposes of EU merger control law and that the European Commission consequently did not have the power to require Ryanair to divest its minority shareholding (see, VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2010, No. 7).

BelgiumAntitrust/Competition Law

HighlightS

MERGER CONTROL - Commission conditionally clears Syngenta's acquisition of Monsanto's sunflower seed business, following phase II investigation ■ French Competition Authority rejects complaint against certain pay TV exclusivity arrangements on grounds of previous merger clearance decision ■ UK Office of Fair Trading launches investigation into Ryanair's acquisition of a minority shareholding in Aer Lingus

CARTELS AND HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS - Commission fines eleven air cargo carriers more than € 799 million for price-fixing cartel

VERTICAL AGREEMENTS - Paris Court of Appeal rules on termination of dealership contract for the sale of motor vehicles

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - ECJ rules that Canon may block unauthorised imports into the EU

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from