Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2025

Spa­tial Plan­ning Agree­ments - What Is And What Is (Not) Al­lowed?

Fellner Wratzfeld & Partners
Fellner Wratzfeld & Partners
Contributor
Fellner Wratzfeld & Partners

Fellner Wratzfeld & Partners

Fellner Wratzfeld & Partners (fwp) was founded in 1999 by Markus Fellner and Kurt Wratzfeld as a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fellner Wratzfeld & Partners

With a decision at the end of last year on regional planning contracts in Tyrol, the Supreme Court strengthened the municipalities' backs when drafting contracts and made very exciting general statements on regional planning contracts and the related design options.

AustriaReal Estate and Construction

With a decision at the end of last year on regional planning contracts in Tyrol, the Supreme Court strengthened the municipalities' backs when drafting contracts and made very exciting general statements on regional planning contracts and the related design options, particularly in connection with the goal of affordable housing, which extend beyond the borders of Tyrol.

Initial situation

In its decision of 19.11.2024 on 1 Ob 57/24z, the Supreme Court dealt fundamentally with the topic of regional planning agreements and the admissibility of certain contractual clauses. The original dispute concerned a regional planning contract concluded between a Tyrolean municipality (defendant) and a property developer (plaintiff). The parties to the dispute agreed that the defendant would reclassify the plaintiff's property from open land to a residential area for the construction of a residential complex, whereas the sale of all units created could only take place under the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from