Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 FEBRUARY 2023

Transparency Of Austrian Cost Agreements In Endowment Policies: Where To From Here?

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Contributor
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr is a leading European full-service law firm with a strong footprint across Central and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

In 2007/2008, the Austrian Supreme Court dealt with the lack of transparency of cost agreements in "old" endowment life insurance policies concluded before 2006.

AustriaInsurance

In 2007/2008, the Austrian Supreme Court dealt with the lack of transparency of cost agreements in "old" endowment life insurance policies concluded before 2006.

Because the issue was raised in collective proceedings, the consequences for individual proceedings were not addressed. Nor did the court address how a gap created by the lack of transparency, if any, should be filled.

What does the law say?

Article 5 of Directive 93/13/EEC stipulates the requirement for transparency of terms: "In the case of contracts where all or certain terms offered to the consumer are in writing, these terms must always be drafted in plain, intelligible language."

While Article 6 of Directive 93/13/EEC provides that unfair terms are not binding on the consumer, the legal consequences of terms that lack transparency are determined exclusively by national law. Therefore, the increasingly strict case law of the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") on unfair terms (see ECJ C-229/19 –

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from