In 2007/2008, the Austrian Supreme Court dealt with the lack of
transparency of cost agreements in "old" endowment life
insurance policies concluded before 2006.
Because the issue was raised in collective proceedings, the
consequences for individual proceedings were not addressed. Nor did
the court address how a gap created by the lack of transparency, if
any, should be filled.
What does the law say?
Article 5 of Directive 93/13/EEC stipulates the
requirement for transparency of terms: "In the case of
contracts where all or certain terms offered to the consumer are in
writing, these terms must always be drafted in plain, intelligible
language."
While Article 6 of Directive 93/13/EEC provides that
unfair terms are not binding on the consumer, the legal
consequences of terms that lack transparency are determined
exclusively by national law. Therefore, the increasingly strict
case law of the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") on
unfair terms (see ECJ C-229/19 –