Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2012

Do Bonus Agreements Require A Shop Agreement?

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Contributor
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr is a leading European full-service law firm with a strong footprint across Central and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

With the amendment of the Austrian Labour Constitution Act (Arbeitsverfassungsrecht; ArbVG), put into force on 1 January 2011, the Austrian legislator reacted to a highly controversial decision of the Austrian Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof; OGH).

AustriaEmployment and HR
Hans-Georg Laimer
Hans-Georg Laimer
Martin Huger
Martin Huger
Author LinkedIn connections

With the amendment of the Austrian Labour Constitution Act (Arbeitsverfassungsrecht; ArbVG), put into force on 1 January 2011, the Austrian legislator reacted to a highly controversial decision of the Austrian Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof; OGH)1. But the amendment raises new questions.

The decision of the Supreme Court

The OGH had to answer whether a "performance-based bonus system" requires a shop agreement. According to the old version of the ArbVG, a shop agreement was needed to implement piece-work wages for wage plans that are similar to piece work and for miscellaneous performance- based bonuses and rewards.

The OGH ruled that a shop agreement is necessary if a bonus system regulates the payout of the bonus by reaching individualised performance goals. Furthermore, replicable criteria must be applied to measure the attainment of these goals and for third parties.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from