Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2014

M&A Technology Transactions

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Contributor
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr is a leading European full-service law firm with a strong footprint across Central and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

A Seller must be aware that any deal can "die" and in the cur­rent M&A envi­ron­ment, the chances that a deal dies are – quite frankly and unfor­tu­nately – not low.

AustriaCorporate/Commercial Law

Tech­nol­ogy is intan­gi­ble, in par­tic­u­lar for M&A lawyers mak­ing tech­nol­ogy deals from their desks, far away from the asset. Intan­gi­ble assets are gen­er­ally hard to grasp and may raise cer­tain issues dur­ing a trans­ac­tion. This arti­cle high­lights some of the typ­i­cal issues in M&A tech­nol­ogy trans­ac­tions and sug­gests solu­tions to tackle/avoid them.

What is "Technology"?

From an M&A lawyer's per­spec­tive, "tech­nol­ogy" is dif­fi­cult to grasp: it is a mix of dif­fer­ent intel­lec­tual prop­erty rights (IPRs), includ­ing patents, util­ity mod­els, copy­rights, semi­con­duc­tor chip designs, as well as know-how and busi­ness secrets. Tech­nol­ogy as such is thus not tan­gi­ble, and that raises cer­tain issues in and brings com­plex­ity to a trans­ac­tion. This arti­cle high­lights some typ­i­cal exam­ples of such issues and sug­gests solu­tions to tackle/avoid them.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from