Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2017

Constitutional Court Rules That Gambling Monopoly Does Not Infringe Upon EU Law

On 15 October 2016, the Austrian Constitutional Court held that the Austrian gambling monopoly does not infringe upon the freedom to provide services under art.

AustriaAntitrust/Competition Law

On 15 October 2016, the Austrian Constitutional Court held that the Austrian gambling monopoly does not infringe upon the freedom to provide services under art. 56 of the TFEU. Therefore, it did not repeal the gambling monopoly for violating the principle of equal treatment.



The Austrian Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH]) in two recent cases (VfGH 15 October 2016, G 103/2016; 15 October 2016, E 945/2016) was asked to examine the question whether the Austrian gambling monopoly infringes upon EU law and/or constitutional law.

Initially, the Austrian Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof [OGH]) had brought one of the cases to the Constitutional Court by making an application for repeal of sec. 3 of the Gaming Act (Glücksspielgesetz), which lays down the gambling monopoly, and other provisions of the Gaming Act, as well as in eventu for repeal of the Gaming Act in its entirety, on grounds of unconstitutionality (OGH 30 March 2016, 4 Ob 31/16m,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from