Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2026

Artificial intelligence in legal practice: professional responsibilities across Australian courts and tribunals

As technology continues to evolve, understanding the limits of AI and maintaining professional diligence will remain essential for meeting both the ethical and procedural obligations of legal practice.

AustraliaTechnology

The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in legal practice has prompted courts and tribunals across Australia to clarify the responsibilities of practitioners. While AI can assist in drafting, research, and organisation, it does not replace professional judgment. Practitioners remain personally responsible for all material filed or relied upon, and recent guidance demonstrates that the courts treat AI-generated content in the same manner as work prepared by the lawyer personally.

Federal courts – establishing the national baseline

The Federal Court of Australia has issued a Notice to the Profession on the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence, which emphasises that practitioners must verify all AI-generated content before filing. (https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/law-and-practice/practice-documents/notice-to-profession/29-april-2025) The Notice highlighted the risks of fabricated authorities, AI systems can generate citations that appear

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from