Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2014

SMSFs investing in private unit trusts - has the ATO changed its view on fixed entitlement?

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

Given the tax consequences, all trust deeds for unit trusts with superannuation funds as unitholders should be reviewed.

AustraliaTax

The ATO has consistently accepted that 'fixed entitlement' is not a defined term for the purposes of the non-arm's length income rule in section 295-550(4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. The ATO outlined their view in TR 2006/7, which provides that an SMSF will have a 'fixed entitlement' if the fund's 'entitlement to the distribution does not depend upon the exercise of the trustee's or any other person's discretion'.

In MH Ghali Superannuation Fund [2012] AATA 527, the ATO submitted that 'fixed entitlement' in section 295-550 did not have a defined meaning but the AAT disagreed and held that 'fixed entitlement' in section 295-550(4) has the same meaning as the defined term in the loss trust rules in Division 272 of Schedule 2F of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from