Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2012

GST risks for property and investment syndicates

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

Many property and investment syndicates described as joint ventures do not qualify as joint ventures for tax or GST.

AustraliaTax

Many property and investment syndicates are described as joint ventures but do not actually qualify as joint ventures for tax or GST purposes because of the narrow scope of the definition of joint venture in the legislation.

For tax purposes, most of these 'joint venture' structures are in fact partnerships or, in cases where a nominee holds the syndicate property, may actually constitute a separate trust estate.

If the parties do not understand what sort of 'tax entity' they have created they may trigger unexpected tax and GST outcomes. These risks have been illustrated by two recent decisions.

In Yacoub v Commissioner of Taxation, Mr and Mrs Yacoub entered into a property development 'syndicate agreement' with a third party. The parties referred to their arrangement as a 'syndicate' and there was an express clause in the document that 'no partnership shall exist between the parties'.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from