Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JULY 2008

GST And Forfeited Deposits

FCT –v– Reliance CarpetCo Pty Limited is of interest to people selling properties because it was the first GST case heard in the High Court and involved the forfeiture of a deposit.

AustraliaTax

FCT –v– Reliance Carpet Co Pty Limited is of interest to people selling properties because it was the first GST case heard in the High Court and involved the forfeiture of a deposit.

Facts

The purchaser of a property failed to settle in time and the sale contract was rescinded and the deposit forfeited to the vendor. The purchaser's accountant requested a tax invoice for the forfeited deposit. The vendor declined to provide a tax invoice on the basis that the deposit was retained as damages in part satisfaction of the vendor's loss and was not consideration for a taxable supply. The vendor was assessed for GST on the forfeited deposit, and objected to the assessment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from