Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2013

The Strict Application of Timeframes for Adjudications under the Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA)

A recent case shows the consequences of failing to meet timelines imposed by the Act.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction
Melissa Koo (Formerly With Kott Gunning)
Melissa Koo (Formerly With Kott Gunning)
Author LinkedIn connections

Following on from our February update on the importance of time limits in construction contract disputes, the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Western Australia in Re Graham Anstee-Brook; Ex Parte Karara Mining Ltd [No 2] [2013] WASC 59 (delivered on 1 March 2013) illustrates the severe consequences of missing a deadline and emphasises the importance of complying with the time frames imposed by the Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA), particularly with respect to adjudications.

Background

On 6 July 2010, Karara Mining Pty Ltd (Karara) and DM Drainage and Construction Pty Ltd (DMC) entered into a contract whereby DMC would construct a pipeline and associated works for the transportation and supply of water from the Twin Hills borefield to the Karara mine site.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from