Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2024

The Pafburn Supremacy – HCA decides against DBPA apportionment

Piper Alderman
Piper Alderman
Contributor
Piper Alderman

Piper Alderman

Helping shape the future of business in Australia with practical, commercial and cutting-edge legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Piper Alderman

Pafburn Pty Limited v The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 [2024] HCA 49 (Pafburn)

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

Pafburn Pty Limited v The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 [2024] HCA 49 (Pafburn)

In Pafburn, the High Court via a split 4:3 decision has handed down one of the most highly anticipated judgments of the year for the construction industry.

On appeal from the NSWCA – this decision set out whether a claim under the DPBA can be apportioned in accordance with the proportionate liability scheme in Pt 4 of the CLA.

The majority judgment

At a glance, the majority (Gageler CJ, and Gleeson, Jagot and Beech-Jones JJ) judgment provides guidance on the non-apportionability of a claim for breach of the DBPA11 duty of care based on:

  1. an analysis of what is vicarious liability, a non delegable duty and a tort, and the operation of the relevant sections of the DBPA pertaining to the statutory duty; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from