Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2017

The cost of an inaccurate planning certificate

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Failure to supply accurate information may mean responsibility for loss suffered by an entity relying on the certificate.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Geju Pty Ltd v Central Highlands Regional Council (No 2)1 concerns whether a council can be held liable for providing misleading information to an entity and, in particular, to an entity that did not request that information.

The decision distils key issues for local governments and potential purchasers of land:

  1. Does a local government owe a duty of care to a third party (including a potential purchaser) in issuing accurate information, namely, a statutory planning and development certificate2, even though that third party did not request the information from the Council and in fact is unknown to the Council? Such a duty may exist if, among other things, there:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from