Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2021

How squatters rights won a Sydney dunny lane

The judge ruled that as he had squatted on the land and used it for more than 12 years, he was entitled to ownership.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

Supreme Court dispute over three square metres of land

It's not often the old Aussie terms "squatters rights" and "dunny" come up in court. However, these terms were quite liberally thrown around in a recent case, where two people were disputing the ownership of a "dunny lane". (See Hardy v Sidoti [2020] NSWSC 1057.)

Located in Redfern, the dunny lane was situated between two properties, belonging respectively to Mr Hardy and Mr Sidoti. This small throughway was once used by carters to pick up buckets of waste from the outdoor toilets (aka dunnies).

The lane at the centre of this Supreme Court dispute measured only 88 centimetres in width and 3.81 metres in length, making a total of 3.35 square metres of land.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from