Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 FEBRUARY 2014

Costs application dismissed following withdrawal of a development application in pending proceeding

The case Rintoul & Ors v Brisbane City Council [2013] QPEC 45 involved an application for costs by a developer.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

In brief - Developer unsuccessful in pursuing costs order

The case Rintoul & Ors v Brisbane City Council [2013] QPEC 45 involved an application for costs by a developer, Greengate Property Group, against a group of submitters, Matthew Rintoul, Debra Venables, Jantine Boers, Christine Clift, Wayne Clift, Vincent Crowley, Joanne Greenhill, Paul Hargreaves, Anthony Newman, Gary Van-Ooy, Leonie Van-Ooy, Rodney Ward and Eugene Zakrjevsky ("the submitters").

The submitters commenced a submitter appeal in the Queensland Planning and Environment Court against the Brisbane City Council's approval of a development application for an integrated care-based village.

The appeal was set down for hearing in the June 2013 sittings, but was removed from the sittings as a result of the submitters bringing an application in pending proceeding seeking, amongst other things, a declaration that the development approval was invalid and of no legal effect and an order that it be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from